URBAN GREEN SPACES AND HUMAN WELLBEING: ASSESSING THE CARRYING CAPACITY OF URBAN PARKS AND RECREATION AREAS IN DANAO CITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58885/ijees.v09i1.030.dcKeywords:
Park usage, boardwalk, overcrowding, park facilities, visitor satisfaction.Abstract
Urban green spaces enhance human well-being, offer ecosystem services, and support sustainable urban development. This study evaluated the carrying capacity of urban parks and recreation areas in Danao City, specifically the Boardwalk, Rizal Plaza, Children's Paradise, and Sands Gateway, focusing on their impact on residents' physical and mental health. The study revealed that Boardwalk has the highest carrying capacity with 909 visitors, followed by Children’s Paradise, Rizal Park, and Sands Gateway, with 291, 256, and 131 visitors on average per day. Through surveys and observational data, the research examines the usage, satisfaction, level of overcrowding, most bothersome aspects, and capacity of these parks. The study shows that the parks' cleanliness and maintenance received the highest customer satisfaction rating, while restroom facilities scored lower. The findings underscore the significant role of green spaces in reducing stress, promoting physical activity, and enhancing mental health. The study emphasized the need to maintain and improve these spaces to cater to the increasing urban population. Recommendations include enhancing cleanliness, expanding parking facilities, improving safety measures, and increasing amenities like benches and shaded areas. Understanding the carrying capacity is crucial to ensuring these parks can accommodate visitors without environmental degradation, thus preserving their benefits for residents. This research highlights the importance of urban green spaces in creating livable, sustainable cities and calls for strategic planning and management to optimize their use and conservation.
References
68% of the world population is projected to live in urban areas by 2050, says UN | UN DESA | United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.). https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html
Barber, A., Haase, D., & Wolff, M. (2021). Permeability of the city – Physical barriers of and in urban green spaces in the city of Halle, Germany. Ecological Indicators, 125, 107555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107555
Dillon, D. & Lee, S.T.H. (2023). Green Spaces as Healthy Places: Correlates of Urban Green Space Use in Singapore. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(17), 6711. doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20176711
Beyer, M., Kaltenbach, A., Szabo, A., Malecki, K. C. (2014). Exposure to Neighborhood Green Space and Mental Health: Evidence from the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(3), 3453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110303453
Siddique, S. & Uddin, M. (2022). Green space dynamics in response to rapid urbanization: Patterns, transformations and topographic influence in Chattogram city, Bangladesh. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.105974
Zhang, Y., Mavoa, S., Zhao, J., Raphael, D., & Smith, M. (2020). The Association between Green Space and Adolescents’ Mental Well-Being: A Systematic Review. Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6640. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186640
Kuo, M., Barnes, M., Jordan, C. (2019). Do Experiences With Nature Promote Learning? Converging Evidence of a Cause-and-Effect Relationship. Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00305
Rogerson, M., Wood, C., Pretty, J., Schoenmakers, P., Bloomfield, D., Barton, J. (2020). Regular Doses of Nature: The Efficacy of Green Exercise Interventions for Mental Wellbeing. Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1526. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fijerph17051526
Konijnendijk, C., Annerstedt, M., Nielsen, A. B., Maruthaveeran, S. (2013). A systematic review. A Report for IFPRA, Copenhagen & Alnarp 70. Benefits of Urban Parks. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=urban+parks+as+an+example+of+green+space+&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1716959381318&u=%23p%3D0xOjb6tpTvgJ
Gradinaru, S., Onose, D. A., Oliveira, E., Slave, A. R., Popa, A. M., & Gavrilidis, A. A. (2023). Equity in urban greening: Evidence from strategic planning in Romania. Landscape and Urban Planning, 230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104614
Lee AC & R. (2011). The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. J Public Health (Oxf), 33(2):212-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdq068
Epub 2010 Sep 10. PMID: 20833671.
https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/article/33/2/212/1585136
Moore, S., Crilley, G., Darcy, S., Griffin, T., Taplin, R., Tonge, J., & Amanda Smith, A. W. (2009). DESIGNING AND TESTING A PARK-BASED VISITOR SURVEY (1st ed.). Sustainable Tourism Pty Ltd. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/17706/1/2008007616OK.pdf
Saleem, A., & Kamboh, K. (2013). Why people visit parks? The role of gender, age and education among urban park visitors in Faisalabad. International journal of Asian social science, 3, 2196-2203.
Pham, T., Labbé, D., Lachapelle, U., & Pelletier, É. (2019). Perception of park access and park use amongst youth in Hanoi: How cultural and local context matters. Landscape and Urban Planning. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169204619302920
Nordh, H., & Østby, K. (2013). Pocket parks for people – A study of park design and use. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.11.003
Yan, X., Li, S., Dong, R., & Li, G. (2022). Study on Influencing factors of the duration of residential leisure travel to urban parks. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5943529
Wu, W., Dong, G., Sun, Y., & Yun, Y. (2020). Contextualized effects of Park access and usage on residential satisfaction: A spatial approach. Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104532
Jung, S.G., Lee, S.G., & Kang, D.H. (2014). A Study on User Behavior and Satisfaction with Neighborhood Parks within Walking Distance with Consideration for Interior and Exterior Environments – Focusing on the Case Study Hwarang and Gwanum Park, Daegu. Semantic Scholar. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.5.110
Byeong-Hwa, S., Byoung-E, Y., & Gwan-Gyu, L. (2006). A Study on the User Satisfaction for Park Facilities in Bukhansan National Park through the Analysis of Expectancy-Result Disconfirmation. Semantic Scholar.
Gholipour, S., Mahdinejad, J., & Saleh Sedghpour, B. (2021). Security and urban satisfaction: developing a model based on safe urban park design components extracted from users' preferences. Security Journal, 35, 863-892.
https://doi.org/10.1057/S41284-021-00303-4
Kang, H., Lee, S., & Back, S. (2016). Current Status and User Satisfaction Analysis of Neighborhood Park for Barrier Free Friendly Park - A Focus on Cheonho Park, Gandaemae Park and Hunlyunwon Park. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 19, 135-153. https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2016.19.1.135
Krüger, E.L., Piaskowy, N.A., Moro, J., & Minella, F.O. (2019). Identifying solar access effects on visitors’ behavior in outdoor resting areas in a subtropical location: a case study in Japan Square in Curitiba, Brazil. International Journal of Biometeorology, 63, 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-018-01664-z
Hsieh, M., & Lee, W. (2010). Effect of Spatial Elements in an Open Space on a Subject′s Psychological Perception. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 9, 111 - 116. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.9.111
Kabisch, N., Kraemer, R., Masztalerz, O., Hemmerling, J., Püffel, C., & Haase, D. (2021). Impact of summer heat on urban park visitation, perceived health and ecosystem service appreciation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 60, 127058. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2021.127058
Mohamed, N., & Othman, N. (2012). Push and Pull Factor: Determining the Visitors Satisfactions at Urban Recreational Area. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 49, 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2012.07.016
Liu, R., & Xiao, J. (2020). Factors Affecting Users’ Satisfaction with Urban Parks through Online Comments Data: Evidence from Shenzhen, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010253
Yang, M., Wu, R., Bao, Z., Yan, H., Nan, X., Luo, Y., & Dai, T. (2023). Effects of Urban Park Environmental Factors on Landscape Preference Based on Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics of Visitors. Forests. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14081559
Man Rai, C., Dorji, Y., & Zangmo, S. (2022). User Satisfaction and the Social and Environmental Benefits of Urban Green Spaces: A Case Study of Thimphu City, Bhutan. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning. https://doi.org/10.54028/nj202221216
Çevik, H. (2020). The Relationship Between Park Satisfaction, Place Attachment and Revisit Intention in Neighborhood Parks with Physical Activity Facilities. Journal of Education and Learning, 9, 178. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9n2p178
Muslim, H.F., Kadir, N.A., Yahya, N.A., & Mamat, M.P. (2017). Motivations for outdoor recreation in tropical urban parks.
Zhang, L., Liu, S., & Liu, S. (2021). Mechanisms Underlying the Effects of Landscape Features of Urban Community Parks on Health-Related Feelings of Users. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157888
Quagraine, V.K., Asibey, M.O., & Mosner-Ansong, K.F. (2023). Factors that influence user patronage and satisfaction of urban parks in Ghanaian cities: case of the Rattray Park in Nhyiaeso, Kumasi. Local Environment, 29, 224 - 244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2023.2282064
Schroeder, H.W., & Anderson, L.M. (1984). Perception of Personal Safety in Urban Recreation Sites. Journal of Leisure Research, 16, 178-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1984.11969584
Hami, A., & Emami, F. (2015). Spatial Quality of Natural Elements and Safety Perception in Urban Parks. https://doi.org/10.15242/iicbe.c0215153
World Health Organization. (2010). Public Parks and Open Spaces - A Planning and Development Guide. https://chm.cbd.int/api/v2013/documents/9D0D456A-FAC1-9806-3B90-21B37D4DEE5B/attachments/207967/Public%20Parks%20and%20Open%20Spaces%20-%20A%20Planning%20and%20Development%20Guide.pdf
Westover, T.N., & Collins, J.R. (1987). Perceived crowding in recreation settings: an urban case study. Leisure Sciences, 9, 87-99.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408709512149
De Lacerda, A. B. M., Magni, C., Morata, T. C., Marques, J. M., & Zannin, P. H. T. (2005). Ambiente urbano e percepção da poluição sonora. Ambiente & Sociedade, 8(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1414-753x2005000200005
Hanif, A., Shirazi, S.A., & Majid, A. (2020). ROLE OF COMMUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES sIN URBAN PARKS.
http://pakjas.com.pk/papers/3286.pdf
Mak, B., & Jim, C. (2019). Linking park users' socio-demographic characteristics and visit-related preferences to improve urban parks. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2019.03.008
Veitch, J., Ball, K., Crawford, D., Abbott, G., & Salmon, J. (2013). Is park visitation associated with leisure-time and transportation physical activity? Preventive medicine, 57 5, 732-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.08.001
Sagrero, K.I. (2018). Socializing Public Space: Benches in the Urban Setting. Semantic Scholar. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.658
Cherian, N.C., & Subasinghe, C. (2022). Sun-Safe Zones: Investigating Integrated Shading Strategies for Children’s Play Areas in Urban Parks. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010114
Yue-hua, C. (2009). Study of Factors on the Scope of Construction Sites that Influence Urban Park’s Landscape and Environment. Central South Forest Inventory and Planning. Semantic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Study-of-Factors-on-the-Scope-of-Construction-Sites-Yue-hua/ffac7089f03fa087331964f68384823c5bb8c0df
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.